So Matpat was off. So i decided to state my own theory. While "Its Just a Dream" Theory works and scott admitted it was close but not there. Also he seems to not be talking about the fnaf 2 arcade games. so heres my theory!
Now in the arcade game in fnaf 2, 5 children follow the fredbear and die. In that mini-game the puppet exist before the 5 are killed. The 5th kid is put into a fredbear suit. In fnaf 2, A crying child dies in outside by the hands of purple guys. Now we know it has to be a fredbear. Perhaps it was not freddy but fredbear? In the arcade game the bear was NOT brown but perhaps a bit golden? In the "Save Them" Mini game the freddy from fnaf 1 was infact very much brown. I agree that perhaps that in 1983 there were multiple chains. That Fnaf 4 could work into fnaf 1. Its just a different vary. While on some points i agree with mat. But see heres the problem i faced. We have proof in the fnaf 2 minigame that golden freddy is the 5th child killed. We know that a crying child dies outside of the restraunt. We also know that the kid in fnaf 4 dies by golden fredbear. I think that perhaps there may be more than one child in those suits. Afterall how said there weren`t? So far my theory is that Mat is correct about the boy being the marionette but at a different angle. The marionette is two people. The crying child who died outside of the restraunt being The fnaf 4 child`s stuffed bear. In the minigame didnt the puppet do EXACTLY what the plushie in fnaf 4 of fred bear say? He put them back together. In other words he gave them back their life, but not exactly like that. I mean cmon really why AREN`T They going to use the golden bonnie suit to stuff kids in it? Oh wait i know. Because for some reason spring trap, aka Spring bonnie, Is actually the skinnest of them all. While i understand why people might argue think of it like this, No way the toys are skinner. Truth be told i think the dream theory still holds. The toys are not real animatronics and are infact part of a dream. So heres my Complete Theory.
--------
In Fnaf 4, The Crying Child that was bitten in 1983, watched the crying child of fnaf 2 minigme die. He Realised who the murder was. His Plush bear who i believe is the crying child that he watched die, with him, is a part of the marionette. After the bite he was put into a coma. In His Coma he and his plushie become the marionette in fnaf 2. After Fnaf 2 ends he reconises the toy animatronics as being not real, thus them being scrapped. In Fnaf 3 we see phantom puppet, freddy, mangle, BB, Chica, and Foxy. BB is a kid he saw, in fact i think these are actually some people he saw before he died. Mangle being who ever room he went in with the broken mangle toy, BB being the fat kid with the ballon, Puppet being the plushie. Now lets rewind to 4 years after he died. This means that because of the 4 year gap its not 1987. The year of the bite 1987. Now it could have been any animatronic, but as for the victmn. well we have another body in the bunch. Everyones theorys say its all the phone guys brother who was bitten. Well i truthfully dont know but hey my theory may or may not be partially on target. Now look at foxy in fnaf 1, There is no spring lock. So my theory is...that the bite of 1987 was caused by the spring locked animatronics. But heres my question, when did purple guy actually die? Was it in fnaf 2 or 3....maybe Fnaf 4, well i think i`ll clear it up a bit. Looking at the fnaf 2 minigame map he is still alive by then, but he died in the fnaf 1 map. My theory is that fnaf 2 was a different franchise. He has his list of fnaf restraunts to kill children in. Looking at the minigame map. This was when the purple guy died. Now looking back on the minigame where you gather children with cake in fnaf 2, theres a problem here. the children are scatter through 4 party rooms. by a fredbear, by now notice how fredbear is purple guys Favorite disguise yet? Welp see ya`ll later, Hope you have a great day, Enjoy the partial theory!
No comments:
Post a Comment